

| Subject: | Re: Engine Conversion Eurospec vs. nonEurospec |
| From: | Paolo Damiani |
| Date: | Sun, 2 Jan 2000 23:47:38 EST |
In a message dated 1/2/00 10:39:21 PM Eastern Standard Time, skp@PACBELL.NET writes: > Hello, > > I recently had the engine converted in my 85 Vanagon with the Eurospec 2.0 > conversion kit. I am insanely curious if other conversions packages have the > same problems. > > Namely: > > 1)seeminly incurable electrical problems. Yes, particularly hot starting problems. My installer had to put in a manual switch to bump the fuel pump relay. The switch has made it a very reliable starter. Without it, I never would have accepted delivery. > > 2)incredilbly loud droning at about 3900 RPM. Yes. I believe it's a combination of muffler and intake noise. It gets a bit better above 4000 RPM > > 3)Intermitant hesitations/rough idle. Never had these. It's been very smooth, although it sometimes "wanders" a bit looking for a steady idle speed. A kick down will usually cure it. > > Though it appears that most conversions use the same main parts such as > mounts and plumbing, other items such as wiring harness and exhaust system > are completely different. > > With this info, I can go back to the installer and Eurospec and point out > that other conversions with a certain type of exhaust, for example, don't > emit a deafening drone a freeway speeds. I think all Eurospec installees should get together and approach Eurospec and have them address these issues. > If you have had a conversion, please reply and let me know made the > conversion and if you have had ANY problems. A local outfit did the install. On the plus side, I have excellent driveability, torgue and very good gas mileage (about 20 city and 23-24 on highway). Paolo 89 Carat 156K
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »