

| Subject: | Re: average mpg of the 2.1 L w/automatic |
| From: | T. Thompson |
| Date: | Fri, 14 Jan 2000 13:41:40 -0400 |
I have an 1.9l Automatic which I consistently get 20MP Imperial Gallon which is about 17Mp US Gallon.What I find interesting is that I get the same milage at 55MPH as 70MPH. I would have thought for a brick shaped vehicle that the slower I went it would pay off big time in milage. My only theory is that at the slower speed every hill causes a kickdown into second gear where at 70 the kickdown is either delayed or doesn't happen. A friend of mine has a Ford Conversion van which is bigger, way heavier (6000 lbs) and has way more power (302-V8). He gets 20MPG so I really lost the argument for efficient German engineering. He can't cook in his though so on long journeys we make a good team, we cook in mine and watch TV in his. Tony 85GL "Westfailure" Douglas Demarest wrote: > I get about17mpg or so with my 2.1 manual. I can get 21 or more if I only > drive 45 mph and don't have any kayaks on top. I have thought that this is > pretty poor gas mileage--before I boutht my van I assumed it would get > upwards of 20. I'm curious to see what everyone else gets. It was > interesting to read posts on the Waterboxer discussion from someone getting > 25 mph with a faster engine. > > Doug Demarest > Minneapolis, MN
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »