

| Subject: | Re: Upper Controlarm Torque |
| From: | Dennis Haynes |
| Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2000 22:15:44 -0500 |
The Non-Syncro's should be set up the same way. They are a bit more tolerant because the stamped steel control arm can bend. Also, there are two different types of bushings. They were upgraded a number of years ago due to frequent failures. They later ones have a black end cover instead of the white plastic. Also, I have come across some after market bushings that are pure garbage. Dennis ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ken Hunter" <EVEHART33@AOL.COM> To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2000 12:09 PM Subject: Upper Controlarm Torque > Page 40.2 in Bentley's shows a torque of 54ft lb on the upper control arm nut > for the up to 10-84 non synchro. No mention of using different thickness > eccentric washers for clearance as per page 40.18 for the Synchro. Is there a > clearance spec for the non-Synchro control arm? I've got the same squeak and > my bushings appear to be OK.
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »