yes.

The list is a privately run and operated function. The first amendment
rights you think you have do not apply. It's not fair but that is how it
is. If the admins of GERRY feel a thread has run it's course, or has
gotten significantly off course, they can filter it into oblivion. One
of the rules you agreed to when you signed up. It's right there... in
Section 43A sub-paragraph b7 riboflavin, et al...

So... if they want to kill the oil thread and let the tire thread
live... I will live also. And continue to subscribe to the best auto
list I have been associated with.

tim o'brien

please kill this thread now!

Zoltan Kuthy wrote:
>
> Is there a Mr. God who will decide what is or is not good for the list
> without letting the members know about what was rejected and why?  Like a
> democratic dictator(ship)?
> Or is it going to be claimed that it is the internet's fault that certain
> messages will not appear for view, no matter how beneficial it may be to
> all?  And complaining may end up in sudden death?  Only obedient sheep will
> be tolerated?  Put up or shut up?  What is the opinion of the masses about
> this subject?  Or am I only reminiscing about the time I spent living under
> different dictatorships?  Or is the list a living Bentley manual with hands
> on experience exchanging advises?  Nevertheless, it is still the best I
> know.
> Zoltan
>
> John McLean wrote:
>
> > Question?
> > how do the moderators " end a thread" ?    Is there a filter that simply
> > rejects any posting with given wording in the subject line?
> > Just wondering,
> > John McLean  87 Vanagon GL