

| Subject: | Re: Digitool diagnostics |
| From: | Mark Drillock |
| Date: | Thu, 16 Mar 2000 07:51:36 -0800 |
Well David, as usual you hit it right on the head. I want to be able to use my Digitool on 3 or 4 different VW FI systems without having to have a spare modified ECU for each type. The Digitool is a great invention and I want to apply it's benefits as broadly as possible. Having a single "T" adapter with DB25 pigtails wired for each ECU type would let me do this easily. Mark David Beierl wrote: > > At 08:12 AM 3/16/2000 , KENWILFY@AOL.COM wrote: > >The problem that you have here is if you had some kind of shunt to allow you > >to test a van with the digitool without removing the ECU, how would you > >install it? The only way would be to unplug the ECU, plug in this shunt > >connector, and then plug the ECU connector into some kind of other connector > >(that might not exsist) and hook up the digitool. This is actually more work > >than just swapping in a digitool equipped ECU. The only advantage this would > > Ken, the "shunt connector" would simply be a male-female pair of the exact > connector that the ECU already uses, wired straight through pin-to-pin -- > with (ideally) a *pair* of Digitool connectors, one set up for Digijet and > one for Digifant. Using it would be like falling off a log, except for > making sure you had it plugged in for the proper computer. The only snag > is that such connectors aren't easy to find -- someone ?David Marshall? was > trying to locate a supply earlier, not sure how far he got. They also > might easily run $20 each, or about $50 for materials for the complete > connector quad -- but from that point forward setting up a van for testing > would take about 90 seconds. *Also* it would provide better results b/c an > intermittent ECU failure could be influencing the problem as well -- using > a different ECU would tend to conceal this problem. > > david > ps -- have you forgotten me? :) > > David Beierl - Providence, RI > http://pws.prserv.net/synergy/Vanagon/ > '84 Westy "Dutiful Passage" > '85 GL "Poor Relation"
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »