CO is still at 1.5% - nothing changed there.

At 09:05 AM 27/03/2000 -0800, Dana Morphew wrote:
>Your stochiometric ratio became leaner somehow.  CO adjustment?  If you
>find the answer and it is repeatable, it will be a compelling argument
>for the inline four conversion.
>
>-Dana-
>
>David Marshall wrote:
>...
>> trip through rolling hills at a leasurly 95 to 100km/h - this translates
>> into 8.8L per 100km (26.7 US mpg)- the trip back we did a little more speed
>> ranging from 100km/h to 115km/h plus really pushing hard in 3rd going up
>> some of the steep hills - we consumed 14L of gasoline or 11.2L per 100km
>> (21 US mpg).
>>
>> So, why did things get better with a throttle that opens quicker?  Not that
>> I am complaining!
>>
>
>

--   David Marshall -                    - Quesnel, BC, Canada   --
--    78 VW Rabbit, 80 VW Caddy, 84 VW Westie, 85 VW Cabriolet   --
--       87 Audi 5000 Quattro, 88 2.0L VW Syncro Double Cab      --
-- David's Volkswagen Home Page        http://www.volkswagen.org --
-- Fast Forward Autobahn Sport Tuning  http://www.fastforward.ca --
-- david@volkswagen.org (pmail) or vanagon@volkswagen.org (list) --