

| Subject: | Re: CB or cell? |
| From: | Pat Collins |
| Date: | Fri, 21 Apr 2000 14:26:52 -0500 |
Don't discount ham radio either. Has of the 15th the fcc has relaxed the testing requirements. You can study the actual test on sites like http://www.eham.net. With 50 watts on 2 meters and a 5/8 wavelength antenna you can get any repeater within 50 miles. Also, a lot of the repeaters are linked with multi-state coverage. Pat N8VW On Fri, Apr 21, 2000 at 01:45:19PM -0500, Michael C. Duran wrote: > Is your cell phone a REAL cell phone or a PCS? If it has analog > capabilities, chances are you are covered. If it is digital only (PCS), > then chances are you won't be covered. Analog cellular covers 98% of > places on the continent where humans live. Digital PCS? Bahah!! Go off > the Interstate and bye-bye coverage. > > Secondly, CB radios, at least down in Texas are virtually out of use by all > but truck drivers. Truck drivers MIGHT be nice enough to help you out if > they get your cry for help, but chances, IMO, are slim based on my prevoius > CB conversations with truckers. Many of the smarter truckers run w/ > squelch up high so they don't hear all the crap (cussing, sex jokes, blah > blah) of the other truckers. Also, FYI, nobody monitors channel 9, the > "emergency" channel. The cell phone is your best bet unless you can afford > a satellite phone :) > > Also, if you're ever cruising with a group it's probably a good idea to get > a FRS radio. It's a low-powered walkie-talkie style radio used by alot of > civilians (it stands for Family Radio Service). So far I find alot more > individuals in cars using FRS than CB anymore. The range is alot shorter, > but you're alot more likely to find a friendly voice when next to a highway. > > Good luck... > > -Michael > > At 11:43 AM 4/21/2000 -0600, Drew Bedford wrote: > >I'm heading off to a rather remote location for a weekend camping trip > >and I began to ponder communications. In case "Happy" gets unhappy, > >should I add a CB to the glovebox? I already have a national-coverage > >cell phone, but rural Utah is, well... rural. Has anyone gotten out of a > >jam using a CB where no cell coverage was available? Seems like fairly > >cheap insurance. > > > >TIA, > >Drew > >83.5 Westy >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »