

| Subject: | Subaru Swap, was: Re: T****a Vanagon? |
| From: | Rusty Johnson |
| Date: | Thu, 11 May 2000 03:15:17 EDT |
In a message dated 5/10/00 10:59:38 PM Mountain Daylight Time, Larry Hamm
writes:
> Rusty Johnson (that's me, by the way -- I'm following up my original post)
wrote:
> >
> > Instead of sourcing the mechanicals to Toyota, how about Fuji Heavy
> > Industries (Subaru) instead? That way you'd get a boxer engine -- SVX
> Flat-6
> > maybe? -- and Syncro (sort of) automatically!
>
> Rusty,
> That's what I'm doing, but with the Legacy 2.2L and Syncro drive
> train/suspension. The SVX engine is a bit hard to come by, pricey when
> you find it, and would require some beefing of the drivetrain.
> Larry
>
If my van were water-cooled, I'd do that swap too (Legacy 2.2L), if given
the slightest excuse -- like needing an oil change <g>. It would be simpler
to start over with a wasserboxer or diesel model, however. Good point on the
SVX powerplant -- it would be a bit too strong for the transmission, and a
lot harder to fit into the engine bay. I only mentioned it in the context of
a hypothetical powertrain to be designed expressly for the Vanagon by Subaru,
not a real-world replacement option. It wouldn't surprise me if it's been
done, though.
Rusty J.
Ogden, UT
'80 Westy -- Slow Motion Fahrvergnugen...Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »