

| Subject: | Re: Fw: HILL VOTES ON IP REGULATION TUESDAY: SOS |
| From: | David Beierl |
| Date: | Sat, 13 May 2000 20:10:34 -0400 |
At 19:28 5/13/2000, Adam Puzerewski wrote: >This is all phony. It is the stuff of Urban Legend. Fraid you jumped too quick on this one, Adam -- here's the text of the Bill as reported out of committee yesterday... >May 12, 2000 >Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole House >on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed >[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in >italic] > >A BILL >To prohibit the imposition of access charges on Internet service >providers, and for other purposes. >Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United >States of America in Congress assembled, >[Struck out->] SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. [<-Struck out] >[Struck out->] This Act may be cited as the `Internet Access Charge >Prohibition Act of 1999'. [<-Struck out] >[Struck out->] SEC. 2. PURPOSE. [<-Struck out] >[Struck out->] It is the purpose of this Act to ensure that Internet >information services will continue to be deployed as rapidly and >efficiently to as many Americans as possible by preventing the Federal >Communications Commission from applying interstate access charges to >providers of Internet services. [<-Struck out] >[Struck out->] SEC. 3. PROHIBITION OF ACCESS CHARGES ON INTERNET SERVICE >PROVIDERS. [<-Struck out] >[Struck out->] Section 254 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. >254) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: >[<-Struck out] >[Struck out->] `(l) PROHIBITION OF ACCESS CHARGES ON INTERNET SERVICE >PROVIDERS- Notwithstanding subsection (b)(4) or (d) or any other provision >of this section, the Commission shall not impose on any interactive >computer service (as such term is defined in section 230(e)) or other >information service provider any access charge for the support of >universal service that is based on a measure of the time that >telecommunications services are used in the provision of such interactive >computer service or information service.'. [<-Struck out] >SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. >This Act may be cited as the `Internet Access Charge Prohibition Act of 2000'. >SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF CHARGES ON PROVIDERS OF INTERNET ACCESS SERVICE. >Section 254 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 254) is amended >by adding at the end the following new subsection: >`(l) PROHIBITION OF CHARGES ON INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDERS- >`(1) IN GENERAL- Notwithstanding subsection (b)(4) or (d) or any other >provision of this title, the Commission shall not impose on any provider >of Internet access service (as such term is defined in section 231(e)) any >contribution for the support of universal service that is based on a >measure of the time that telecommunications services are used in the >provision of such Internet access service. >`(2) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION- Nothing in this subsection shall preclude the >Commission from imposing access charges on the providers of Internet >telephone services, irrespective of the type of customer premises >equipment used in connection with such services.'. >Union Calendar No. 335 >106th CONGRESS >2d Session >H. R. 1291 >[Report No. 106-615] >A BILL >To prohibit the imposition of access charges on Internet service >providers, and for other purposes. > >May 12, 2000 >Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole House >on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed David Beierl - Providence, RI http://pws.prserv.net/synergy/Vanagon/ '84 Westy "Dutiful Passage" '85 GL "Poor Relation"
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »