

| Subject: | Re: Delicate Question? Has anybody installed a ... |
| From: | Marshall Ruskin |
| Date: | Tue, 23 May 2000 01:39:13 -0500 |
I wonder if a porta potti - or a similar system could be put into the area under the bench seat. I think the passenger side would be best. To use it, obviously you'd have to hook up a clip or something to keep the seatback from whopping you, especially at such a critical moment. Marshall Ruskin 84 Westy >Bob, > >The reason it doesn't come up often is because a Thetford PortaPotti (or its' >look-alikes) works so darn well. Plus there's none of the attendant problems >associated with emptying the onboard black water tank, hose storage, and dump >area clean up. > >Don't forget the Vanagon is very short as far as RV's go. It's less that 15 >feet! Most Class B vehicles with plumbed toilets are in vans 17-19 feet long >that have engines mounted in the front. They have more available floor space >than a Vanagon. After the necessary camper fixtures are installed there is very >little floor space left in a Vanagon. > >In addition, there isn't much room on the Vanagon's underside for a large >traditional black water tank. On my van the gray water tank holds 13 gallons and >occupies the area opposite my propane tank (the reverse of the Westfalia). For >black water you would want a tank with a larger capacity. Another option is a >recirculating toilet like those used in the Xplorer van conversion. An RV, which >at 20 feet, is 5 feet longer than a Vanagon. > >So you don't get the wrong idea, I like the smaller footprint of the Vanagon and >am willing to forego some of the "luxuries" found on its' larger brethren. > >BTW, I do have a plan that might work for someone provided they are willing to >sleep at night while sitting on the toilet . <G> > >Garrett Adams >83.5 Adventurewagen GL >Stockton, California >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »