

| Subject: | Re: Thinking about a Previa, anyone owned both Vanagon and Previa? |
| From: | Benjamin Tan |
| Date: | Fri, 26 May 2000 18:12:16 EDT |
I've owned a '91 Previa since new in 1990. 2WD, auto trans, 2.4 non-supercharged. I don't believe they came with a turbo (atleast not in the US). Power windows and locks, all seats recline. Rear most seats recline and fold sideways flat against the walls for cargo. This things was fabulous to drive and relatively trouble free. I know four other people w/ Previas. Everyone complains of squeaky dashes after the second year. Otherwise, they're good vehicles. They do have a tendency to consume front tires. The trade-off? Good car-like handling. Windshield wipers are extremely expensive but dealers will sell just the rubber part of the blade for economy. Works fine. Getting to the oil filter is nearly impossible without a lift or lack of some kind. I could go on and on and on. Pmail me if you need to know more. The Previa now has over 200,000 miles on the odometer without any major mechanical breakdowns. Lastly, let me liken the experience of owning a Previa vs. a Vanagon as follows: (I paraphrasing here) I read about this doctor who owned a Ferrari, a Porsche 930, and an Acura NSX. He said he owned the Ferrari out of passion for it, owned the Porsche for shear driving pleasure, and the Acura NSX because he needed a commute car which was reliable and cheap to fix. BenT San Francisco
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »