

| Subject: | Re: Head Temperature Readings |
| From: | Max/Joyce Wellhouse |
| Date: | Sat, 24 Jun 2000 02:44:26 -0700 |
Gene Berg once told me years ago that if depend on accurate temperature readings on anything and use a pyrometer that costs less than $900, you are fooling yourself. And that was late 80's money he was talking. I used to have a VDO head temp gauge on my 79 loaf, but I put the sending unit on the exhaust manifold stud for #3. It read hotter(up to 450 on full throttle climbs up steep interstate grades) than when under the spark plug seat and I didn't like trustingthat ring unit to seal the combustion gases either. Mounting it under the head temp sensor for the FI gave way too cool a reading as well. If you look at the gauge as A/B/C/D/E markings instead of an arbitrary set of numbers, you can benefit from knowing when the engine is running at normal temps and when it's running hotter than normal. BTW, I have a new HT gauge and used sender and wire kit I'd let go of for $25. P mail me and 1st come first served, DM&FS -----Original Message----- From: David <david@renaissance-design.com> To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> Date: Friday, June 23, 2000 11:40 AM Subject: Head Temperature Readings >I recently installed a VDO cylinder temp guage and am off on my first trip of 2000mi. The question is how accurate are these guages and what is an acceptable temperature for the #3 cylinder? > >I am seeing 375-425 at highway speeds with 450 degrees at the start whent he alternator is charging the battery. This sounds high to me, but I am not sure how acuurate the guage really is and am not sure what is an OK range for #3. Can anyone tell me the range or accuracy of the guage. > >David > >PS. I just finished a 26 hour, 1200 mile trip and everything seems to run fine, it's been 90+ degrees out. BTW the flaps are all the way open and the tin is prettly well sealed.
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »