

| Subject: | Re: How safe is it? |
| From: | Mark Dorm |
| Date: | Wed, 19 Jul 2000 01:18:33 PDT |
I thought it was 218' 70-0 for a Vanagon... which is the same as a 1982 Honda Civic... its not the SUV which is so dangerous - its the person driving them - and they would be dangerous no matter what they were driving... >From: Joel Walker <jwalker@bama.ua.edu> >Reply-To: Joel Walker <jwalker@bama.ua.edu> >To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM >Subject: Re: How safe is it? >Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 16:15:58 -0500 > > > The slogan for the school of SUV 'safety' design: "Kill or be killed." > >hot damn!! Road Warz!!! Death Race 2000 (which, by the by, is a funny >comedy, if you don't mind a lot of pedestrians getting killed and a really >really really stupid 'plot'. and some really bad acting by sylvester >stallone (i THINK it was his first movie)). :) > > > Notice it says nothing about good brakes? The Ford Expedition takes 220 > > feet to stop from 70 MPH, the late 80's VW Jetta GLI, 175 feet. Any one >know >what the figures are for the Vanagon? > >a syncro camper was tested at 70-0 in 191 feet. so us lighter weight >non-syncro non-campers should do a lot better. i THINK i recall like 184 >feet, but it might have been lower. > >actually, i don't worry so much about stopping before i hit the things in >front of me ... i worry more about that tailgating moron in the Ford >Expedition who's gonna take every bit of his 220 feet to stop!!! :( ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »