

| Subject: | Re: Engine Conversion and MPG |
| From: | Chris Stann |
| Date: | Mon, 24 Jul 2000 15:05:23 -0500 |
It's not the size of Gallon, it's how you use it! Bata bam, bata bing! Chris '85 Westy "Luv Box" -----Original Message----- From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com]On Behalf Of Christopher Michael Gronski Sent: Monday, July 24, 2000 2:57 PM To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM Subject: Re: Engine Conversion and MPG Damn Canadians... Chris Gronski Toronto, Ontario '80 Westy "Pokey" (Sorry, I know it is not Friday but I couldn't resist) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brent Christensen" <brent@vanagon.com> To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> Sent: Monday, July 24, 2000 3:36 PM Subject: Re: Engine Conversion and MPG > This used to baffle me, too until I realized that many of these were > Canadians, who have the luck of having "bigger" gallons than we do down > here... :-) > > (A US gallon is about 0.83 of an Imperial gallon) > > Brent Christensen > '89 GL Syncro Westy "Klaus" > Santa Barbara, CA > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "David Ricketts" <david@renaissance-design.com> > To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> > Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2000 11:14 AM > Subject: Engine Conversion and MPG > > > > I was a little surprised to hear some of the MPG quoted with engine mods > > and conversions. I believe one person said he had 30mpg with a Bus and > > someone else had 25mpg with increased horse power. > > > > Can anyone comment on MPG above 22mpg. Are you getting it with a > > conversion or modifications or stock. I am dripping along at 16 mpg, > > with a motor that doesn't have a lot of power. > > > > Thanks, > > > > David >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »