

| Subject: | Re: FW: Last word about my sig file |
| From: | t |
| Date: | Thu, 27 Jul 2000 09:20:35 -0700 |
Perhaps in the times of 1200kBaud modems. In this day and age of multi-meg downloads, billions of "arty" nude fotographs, and wave/mp3 files coming out the yin/yang, Mr. Bulleys couple of extra lines don't amount to a hill of beans on a gnat's ass. I suggest anyone afraid of loading up their 8 gig hard drive with gmbully sig files, use liberal use of the filter that dumps his writings into the bitbucket. Of course you do lose what is most important.... he has a lot to say that helps me and every other person on the list that bothers to pay attention. I think the subject should be closed. tim o'brien (too lazy to make a sig file) "Carrington, Tom" wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > From: =David-M= [mailto:dmcs@cyburban.com] > Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2000 9:15 PM > To: Vanagon Mailing List > Subject: Last word about my sig file > > Re: Matthew Bulley <gmbulley@bulley-hewlett.com> > > > >My sig file is of my own writing and is not in anyway compensated by >the > >CNU. I am an enigmatic zealot, as many of you know. The sigfile, for >now, > >is my call to actionfor myself and others. > > > Its considered very rude and inconsiderate to have an email signature of > more than 2 or 3 lines. It also contributes to clogging up internet > traffic, one of the things you seem to be against.
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »