I'm with Tim, right down to, and especially, the last line.

Karl Wolz

----- Original Message -----
From: "t" <vbob@primenet.com>
To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM>
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2000 9:20 AM
Subject: Re: FW: Last word about my sig file

> Perhaps in the times of 1200kBaud modems. In this day and age of
> multi-meg downloads, billions of "arty" nude fotographs, and wave/mp3
> files coming out the yin/yang, Mr. Bulleys couple of extra lines don't
> amount to a hill of beans on a gnat's ass. I suggest anyone afraid of
> loading up their 8 gig hard drive with gmbully sig files, use liberal
> use of the filter that dumps his writings into the bitbucket. Of course
> you do lose what is most important.... he has a lot to say that helps me
> and every other person on the list that bothers to pay attention.
> I think the subject should be closed.
>
> tim o'brien (too lazy to make a sig file)
>
>
>
> "Carrington, Tom" wrote:
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: =David-M= [mailto:dmcs@cyburban.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2000 9:15 PM
> > To: Vanagon Mailing List
> > Subject: Last word about my sig file
> >
> > Re: Matthew Bulley <gmbulley@bulley-hewlett.com>
> > >
> > >My sig file is of my own writing and is not in anyway compensated by
>the
> > >CNU. I am an enigmatic zealot, as many of you know. The sigfile, for
>now,
> > >is my call to actionfor myself and others.
> > >
> > Its considered very rude and inconsiderate to have an email signature of
> > more than 2 or 3 lines. It also contributes to clogging up internet
> > traffic, one of the things you seem to be against.
>