

| Subject: | Re: Air vs. Water - pro's and con's |
| From: | The Gunnings |
| Date: | Sat, 5 Aug 2000 17:53:32 -0400 |
Hello Courtney, I had to smile when I read your post. Imagine that, I thought to myself, someone ballsy enough to come to the Vanagon list asking for a possible recommendation for an air-cooled purchase over a Vanagon. I have never owned an aircooled. For what it's worth, I have an 85 1.9 wbx westy. It's my humble opinion that this particular engine is a true marvel of automotive engineering. Even better than the later version wbxers (yikes, now I've let the cat out of the bag!) But, and this is a very big BUT, but only if you understand beforehand that this can be something of a quirky engine. Even more so than most. If I had any advise for you along these lines it would be to the effect that if you are a person who is something of a dilettante, then the air-cooled might be a safer bet. But (and this is where the really big BUT enters the picture) but if you have the capacity to become more than a mere mechanical dilettante and recognize that to have a good relationship w/ a wbx Vanagon usually takes more than that, you will probably be alright. More like a mechanical devotee, instead. Actually, you probably would not have much of a choice than becoming something of a devotee, if you buy a wbx. It can be a large commitment. A devotee is to a dilettante is the musical equivalent of an octave. Pardon the musical analogy but I am feeling slightly jazzed, at the moment. Hope this helps! Cheers, David Gunning Lovell, ME 04051
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »