Courtney Hook wrote:

> I'm sure this gets asked at least once a month, but please excuse me, I
> don't intend to start any arguments, just want some sage advice from those
> that have been there, done that. I'm not a big believer in re-inventing the
> wheel. I have the financial ability to purchase either style of Vanagon, but
> am wondering what the pro's and con's of Air vs. Water might be. I would
> certainly appreciate any advice about which to buy. It would appear that I
> can afford to buy up to about an 85 Vanagon up here in B.C. I've seen the
> prices ranging from 4500 to 8500 for 80 -85 Vanagons in excellent shape,
> body wise.
>
> Please feel free to jump in and tell me about your knowledge and experience.
> :-)
>
> Many thanks in advance,
> Courtney
>          " Canada - The True North, Strong and Free"

The air cooled bus is a lot simpler and easier for the majority of mechanics to
repair.
The water cooled have lots of power even in stock form and more useable room.
The downside to watercooled is the various little understood engine management
systems.
Overall the waterboxer Vanagon wins.
I think if  I was to revert to air cooled it would be in  a "loaf" however.

John McLean    87 Vanagon GL    206,000 miles