

| Subject: | Battery isolator vs combiner?? |
| From: | Ken Hunter |
| Date: | Thu, 10 Aug 2000 20:26:50 EDT |
Being in the mood to install a 2nd battery in my 82 Westy, I have been reading the archives about the SurePower isolator and the more recently mentioned combiner. The drawback to the isolator I had assumed to be about a .7 volt loss in charging and some modification to the alternator regulator. The battery combiner seemed to be the ticket as it didn't have these problems and in addition could (optionally) be used to combine the 2 batteries for emergency starting. The SurePower people tell me, however, that for Vanagons the best choice is the isolator and that the supposed .7 volt charging loss is actually compensated by increasing the charging rate the same amount. Also the isolator being solid-state would last longer and be more trouble free than the electo-mechanical combiner besides being half the cost. Looking at the West Marine catalog the isolator again is mentioned as losing that .7 volt and not being the best way to go. I am probably going to use a deep cycle lead acid battery until I can afford the spiral-wound or gel cells. What am I missing here? Is the isolator OK? Ken Hunter 82 Westy 1.9D 84 Jetta 1.5D 89 Mitsubishi van
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »