No, reply is broken because it puts in this address:

"Carrington, Tom (by way of David Beierl <dbeierl@attglobal.net>)"
<TCarrington@ReliTech.com>

and the mailer picks out the first set of <...> and uses it.  I don't
suppose you actually did get a copy, did you, Tom?  Oh well.  At least it
shows as originally coming from the original sender, and not from Tom...

d

At 10:39 8/8/2000, Carrington, Tom wrote:
>>Please reply to Jose, not me!
>
>
>Tom, if your mailer has a "redirect" function, using it would reduce
>confusion for everybody -- the From: address would read correctly (with "by
>way of..." added) and the reply should go properly as well (this msg will
>test whether that works).
>
>david

David Beierl - Providence, RI
  http://pws.prserv.net/synergy/Vanagon/
'84 Westy "Dutiful Passage"
'85 GL "Poor Relation"