

| Subject: | Re: Transporter |
| From: | Mark Dorm |
| Date: | Mon, 28 Aug 2000 00:21:36 PDT |
I had a 71 - mechanics always told me that a 71 would be about the cheapest loaf to maintain, and it had the plus of disc brakes - which 69 and 70 did not (these were also said to cheap to maintain) - And yeah the 78 is a good year to have, the 79 too, but some tell me the 78 would be preferential to the 78 because of increased smog requirements that were being phased in. I bought the 71 with crack in the case and drove it all over the place - even up that long grade up from Ventura to Thousand Oaks - smog was burning out the back end.... mostly I stayed off the freeway - and I had to stop a lot to fill it with oil - which I did parked on top of that grade on the side of the freeway. I drove it until it finally gave up its ghost. >From: Patrick Bryson <patrickb@extremezone.com> > >Dude! >The only car for you is a '71 type 2. This is the last year for the type 1 >engine and the first year for disk brakes. These all came with dual port >engines but may now have single port. Single is somewhat more desirable >since you don't get cracking on the heads but Dual port has a little more >oomph. the key is to get one the has the correct Dog House oil cooler. >Engine must be very stock. 009 distributor and exhaust are ok. But other >go fast stuff is asking for an engine to cook itself. > >Either a Westfalia pop top or Westfalia non pop camper will do for you. >The >non pops are not too common but are ok. > >If you go for a newer loaf, get a 2 liter not a 1.7 or 1.8. I am a firm >believer in fuel injection and would advise you to avoid one that had the >injection removed. I'm also partial to hydraulic valves because I'm lazy >and that means '78 or '79. > >Still I think you want (need) is a '71. Very easy to maintain. And cheap. >You don't need speed. > >Full of opinions, >Patrick >'85 Westy >prior vans include >'71 Westy >'71 Deluxe Wagon >'76 Insurance reclaim (tres ugly) >'78 Westy >'66 Low rider > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: Flat Four <aircooledvw77t1@engineer.com> >To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> >Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2000 7:29 PM >Subject: Transporter > > > > Hi Listers! :^) I'm 16/m/CA and i'll be needing a used aircooled VW > > for my first car. (used for obvious reasons and not the mexi/beetles) > > I want a Transporter but I am not sure what year or Generation > > Transporter is right for me. I like the Loaf but the Vanagon has a > > lot more to offer. What year Vanagons were aircooled? I would like a > > Westy since I plan on doing a lot of travel in the future. I will be > > doing all the repairs with my own two hands and so i'd like something > > easy to work on. A lot of freeway driving so it should be able to > > make 70 (doesn't have to in windy conditions) I'd like something that > > has the most parts availability. Would the Loaf be easier to work on > > than the Wedge? I don't want the antique split because the visor > > above the two windshields makes a loud houling noise. > > I'll be driving it all through high school&college and probably keep > > it till the day I die. > > > > > > ______________________________________________ > > FREE Personalized Email at Mail.com > > Sign up at http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup > > _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com.
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »