

| Subject: | Re: '86 up vanagon owners.....all please read,and post it to the list.. |
| From: | Michael Townsend |
| Date: | Mon, 28 Aug 2000 12:04:19 -0400 |
I purchased my 90 Carat with about 125k on the broken odometer and coolant stains on the headgaskets. The engine still worked fine, but instead of just fixing the heads, I bought a VWoA rebuild and replaced the engine box coolant and fuel hoses / pipes. The reason I chose the GM Bulley preventative maintenance route instead of fixing the heads only was: 1: The odometer was broken, so I had no idea how many miles were really on the van. 2: The DPO had no concept of Vanagon maintenance -- or car maintenance in general. The dipstick and coolant reservoir were both bone dry when I went to purchase the van, and there was an obvious oil seal leak. They were showing off the van to a buyer, and they didn't even wash or vacuum it! Of course, they knew I was crazy enought to buy it, and they were right. 3: A new rebuild wasn't that much more $$$ than the head job, especially considering how much abuse the engine had alread had. I have 139k on it now, with the repaired odometer, and we are very happy! Replacing the transmission is next on my list! Michael Townsend ---------- > From: JordanVw@aol.com > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > Subject: Re: '86 up vanagon owners.....all please read,and post it to the list.. > Date: Monday, August 28, 2000 10:53 AM > > >>how many of you 2.1L owners are on your second engine, and if so, at what > mileage did you replace it? and what was the reason for failure? how many > of you have over 200k mi on your original engine (without rebuild) ??<< > > i'd appreciate if all of ya with the 2.1L would take the time to respond- and > post your experience w/ your engine to the list.. im not trying to start > some annoying thread, i just think that hearing input from all the > listmembers with the 2.1L (or those of you with a 1.9L feel free to post the > stats on when you replaced your engine too) would be beneficial to all.. im > trying to just see what the average failure rates are for these particular > engines. > appreciate your response- > TIA > chris
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »