

| Subject: | Re: Running without backpressure |
| From: | John Rodgers |
| Date: | Sun, 10 Sep 2000 21:13:41 -0500 |
Running with a broken pipe could cause a fire. Not a good thing. It also
affects the way the fuel, air, and exhaust play on one another, as well
as having an effect on the various sensors.
I had an 85 Vanagon with the 1.9L engine, and on a long trip from
Alaska, the same pipe broke Somewhere in Montana. I decided to run with
it broken all the way to Birmingham, AL. Damn noisy, but no other
problems. Fire concerned me though, all the way. I replaced the pipe
after reaching Alabama.
I have heard of others breaking a pipe on the 1.9L. Makes you wonder
what next!
John Rodgers
88GL Driver
Dave Nadeau wrote:
> Well, I started my trip on Friday from Phoenix to San Diego
> with high hopes, some time by the ocean, all of that stuff.
> About 45 minutes out, my soft exhaust note became noticeable
> different. The Connecting Pipe on my exhaust system ('84
> 1.9L) had broken in half.
>
> I called a mechanic here in Phoenix and asked about running
> the engine without the muffler and cat. He said that it
> wasn't the greatest thing to do, and I shouldn't run it this
> way for long periods. Based on that information, I returned
> home.
>
> My question is this: what is so bad about running the
> engine without back pressure? Is it bad on the valves? The
> noise, of course, is much higher, and certainly illegal.
> But what kind of damage might have been done, or might be
> done to the engine?
>
> Of course, my solution is to get the Connecting Pipe and
> install it immediately, which I will do. Thanks in advance
> for any explanations!
>
> Dave Nadeau
> Phoenix, AZ
> '84 WestyHave something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »