Frankly that is fine, as long as they don't affect my insurance rates. If
you are thrown through a window because you don't have your seatbelt on, you
should not be able to collect on insurance. You did not do the utmost to
avoid personal injury. If you can accept that reality, then I agree, I have
no business with your personal saftey habits. Yet yours is the type first in
line to collect and sue.

I got very mad when the news media yanked our chain about the young boy
killed by a rolling over Explorer. He was thrown from the vehicle. How? You
tell me Firestone was responsible. Nope, the parents were.

tim

>I was around before seat belts and motor cycle helmets and crash tests... I
>liked my 1951 Merc convertible just fine... In Britain we are known as the
>Nanny society,,, someone is always looking out for "our" best interest...
>
>I don't like seat belts and I like helmets less... crash tests are for
>those
>anal retentives who give a shit... I don't...
>
>I will make my own decisions on how much risk is acceptable to me and the
>government can kiss the part of me that goes over the fence last...
>

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.