

| Subject: | Re: Short Tires, Tall Vans |
| From: | Dennis Haynes |
| Date: | Wed, 25 Oct 2000 23:06:04 -0400 |
I've actually bought 4 rolled Vanagon for parts over the years and I know of countless more. Luckily, I guess due to the tall sides, they tend to just lay over on one side where as other SUV's tend to keep rolling like a ball. Dennis -----Original Message----- From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com]On Behalf Of Ed Mellinger Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 2:56 PM To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM Subject: Short Tires, Tall Vans A general question for you folks running those low and/or wide tires on your vans... how much more cornering ability can a Vanagon handle? I've always felt like the van was getting ready to roll over *before* my tires got to the limit of adhesion, and that's on stock tires (185 width and probably 78 aspect ratio, IIRC). In the sports cars I've owned, tire adhesion has dominated the cornering performance. In my Van, I suspect it is the center of gravity... and I don't want to find out myself! Just to motivate the discussion (though I hate to mention the dreaded S*V word here), here's a different group of consumers who is dealing with the immutability of the laws of physics: http://www.msnbc.com/news/480570.asp?cp1=1 I generally feel just that teeny bit smug, in my Van, when the press lampoons the S*V... but not when reading this article. Wouldn't mind seeing the rollover-stat list that Dateline claims they have... anyone else have any experience with Vanagon rollovers, or rollover statistics? regards, Ed Mellinger '84 plain jane
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »