

| Subject: | Fw: Headlight improvements ? |
| From: | Bill Davidson |
| Date: | Wed, 1 Nov 2000 10:40:34 -0800 |
----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Davidson" <wdavidson@thegrid.net> To: <JKrevnov@aol.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2000 10:37 AM Subject: Re: Headlight improvements ? > > I can appreciate your desire to make a secure connection, but why would > you > > solder a crimp connector? > > There was an extensive debate about this on the list a year or two ago... > several recommended crimping and soldering in certain situations... as I > remember the down side of crimp only is that they can vibrate loose and > corrosion can build up inside the crimp connector... the down side of solder > connections are that they can be a bit brittle and can break... > > the advantages of solering should be to eliminate the possibility of the > crimp connection vibrating loose AND it should elimnate the corrosion inside > the crimp connector AND it should assure greater contact surface area and > thus less resistance. > > They are not designed for that type of > > application. In many ways a crimped connection is superior to a soldered > > joint; especially if it experiences any amount of current. > > Like I said... this was debated extensively on the list... by those more > knowledgeable than I (engineers, etc.) ... search the arivhives > > Also, the solder > > wicking into the conductor may have a deleterious effect upon its strain > > relief at the connector. > > not clear what you mean by 'strain relief at the connector' but if you mean > the plastic coating, that obviously is removed for soldering... there are > other ways to get strain relief... > > Bill > > > > > Rich > > >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »