

| Subject: | Re: [Syncro] Heavy Duty Rear Axels/CVs (108mm), Factory |
| From: | Marc Perdue |
| Date: | Wed, 3 Jan 2001 22:08:44 -0500 |
Yes. Coincided with a broken tranny though . . . Just this past week I was driving into Rochester, NY, from Virginia and lost all power due to the bolts/splines breaking that connect the axle to the wheel (?) . . . aaarrgh Marc Perdue EMZ wrote: > One real easy question. Has anyone on the list ever broke > or bent a haft shaft? I can see an advantage to the bigger cv > joints but not a chance of bending or breaking the shaft! The transmission > will break first. > > Eric 86-VW4x4 > vw4x4@fyi.net 86-SS Syncro > Pittsburgh, PA USA 1936-Chrysler > www.my.treeway.com/emz > > On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, mark lortie wrote: > > > I used to have a couple of old land rovers & the rear axles broke once in a while but it > > wasnt a big thing cause you could slip them out through the wheel hub & use 2WD to limp > > home (wouldnt work in a syncro) . At first I thought it was another legendary english design > > problem but upon reflection I realized it was an inexpensive weak link in my drive train & > > fixable in the field (I tried welding a few ... didnt last ). Bottom line it saved my > > tranny when working in low gear ratios . You may ask yourself what you prefer to save .. A > > syncro axle or a tranny . > > > > On the positive side . .. The land rover axles are encased & protected . The syncro axles > > are not and I can easily see a shaf getting bent in the field by dropping onto a rock so a > > heavy duty shaft could be of benefit . > > > > another $0.02 for the pot > > > > -- > > Mark J Lortie PhD > > Division of Nephrology & Hypertension > > UCSD School of Medicine > > La Jolla CA. > > 858-552-8585 x 7139 > > > > > > > > If you would like to modify your subscription settings (including unsubscribing), visit: > > http://www.egroups.com/subscribe/Syncro > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »