The CV joints are from the 5cyl-version of the Audi 5000.
Since the 16" syncros are hard to find, just take the CVs from the Audi. A
lot easier to find!

----- Original Message -----
From: EMZ <vw4x4@FYI.NET>
To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM>
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2001 3:25 AM
Subject: Re: [Syncro] Heavy Duty Rear Axels/CVs (108mm), Factory

>      One real easy question. Has anyone on the list ever broke
> or bent a haft shaft? I can see an advantage to the bigger cv
> joints but not a chance of bending or breaking the shaft! The transmission
> will break first.
>
>             Eric                   86-VW4x4
>             vw4x4@fyi.net          86-SS Syncro
>             Pittsburgh, PA USA     1936-Chrysler
>             www.my.treeway.com/emz
>
> On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, mark lortie wrote:
>
> > I used to have a couple of old land rovers & the rear axles broke once
in a while but it
> > wasnt a big thing cause you could slip them out through the wheel hub &
use 2WD  to limp
> > home (wouldnt work in a syncro) . At first I thought it was another
legendary english design
> > problem but upon reflection I realized  it was an inexpensive weak link
in my drive train &
> > fixable in the field (I tried welding a few ... didnt last ).  Bottom
line it saved my
> > tranny when working in low gear ratios . You may ask yourself what  you
prefer to save .. A
> > syncro axle or a tranny .
> >
> > On the positive side . .. The land rover axles are encased & protected .
The syncro axles
> > are not and I can easily see a shaf getting bent in the field by
dropping onto a rock so a
> > heavy duty shaft could be of benefit .
> >
> > another $0.02 for the pot
> >
> > --
> > Mark J Lortie PhD
> > Division of Nephrology & Hypertension
> > UCSD School of Medicine
> > La Jolla CA.
> > 858-552-8585 x 7139
> >
> >
> >
> > If you would like to modify your subscription settings (including
unsubscribing), visit:
> > http://www.egroups.com/subscribe/Syncro
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>