

| Subject: | Re: vanagon Digest - 6 Jan 2001 - Special issue (#2001-26) |
| From: | John |
| Date: | Sun, 7 Jan 2001 04:25:31 -0500 |
Hi Dan, You're right on the money about the required air-cooled/water-cooled shift. However VW with their clear collabaration with Porsche could have offered an overhead cam four(like Subaru)or even an in-line 5 cylinder. Instead they arrogantly offered only the basic powerplants to a BOOMING World-class U.S. auto market and neatly handed their market share to Chyrsler for their mini-van. I think it's true that when the Germans are on the ball, their automotive achievements are stunning; however when they miss the market signals, they error badly. VW is clearly an auto company that "created" the U.S. economy car market(beetle), the mini-van market(Bus), the SUV market(Syncro Van)and even the van sliding door and then lost ALL of these "bread & butter" markets due to their Teutonic-cultural, classic nose-in-the-air attitude. Then the "shit head" execs who approved these "Titanic-grade marketing errors", simply grabbed the pull-string on their "Golden Parachutes" and left. Regards, John P.S. - I'm just glad that I have an '86 Syncro and a '91 2WD Westy MV, both with fresh VW exchange long blocks. The Eurovan is surely a marketing "Disaster" since VWoA chose not to offer such a vehicle(in certain years w/affordable engines)in a BOOMING U.S. automotive market.
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »