

| Subject: | Re: Cairo Report, now K&N |
| From: | Bill Davidson |
| Date: | Tue, 9 Jan 2001 10:25:29 -0800 |
Mark, A well reasoned post. Thank you! > Are you saying that K&Ns must filter smaller particles than paper > filters or they are no good? No. But that has been the claim in several posts. >How did this become the issue? Who knows how any of the issues on the list become what they become :).... but seriously, certainly the number and size of particles passed through the filter is a significant factor... after all, that is the purpose of the air filter.... filtering! >The standard > I use for products to replace my current ones are do the benefits from > switching outweigh the costs of switching. This is a very good point and I'd love to read any cost-benefit data that can be provided. But, again, the K&N marketing seems to fall short in this department to... they seem to favor theory and hype rather than actual data. Bill Bill
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »