

| Subject: | Re: road trip report - Calgary/Seattle |
| From: | David Beierl |
| Date: | Tue, 16 Jan 2001 13:57:43 -0500 |
A-weighted or C-weighted? Only the A-weighted number is valid for hearing-damage purposes...(C-weighted is flat, A-weighted rolls off the low end considerably). Also, was it a $30 Radio Shack meter like mine, or a "real" one (there are $250 meters available, but to do OSHA industrial measurements you need the $1200 one as I recall (all prices about 15 years old...). I think it would be great to use the RS meter since they're cheap, available everywhere, and I *think* fairly consistent from meter to meter. Also it would be good to have both C- and A- numbers, also possibly fast and slow meter damping (four readings in all). david At 01:05 PM 1/16/2001, Keith Adams wrote: >I took some noise measurements along the way, using a borrowed sound >meter. "quiet" highway driving (i.e. not pushing a big wind, 50 mph or >so) gave us between 84 and 88 dB. "noisy" highway driving (i.e. pushing >a big wind, 70 or 75 mph) gave us 90 to 94 dB. Both times radio on >(checked with radio off, but it doesn't do much) fan on #1, sound level >meter held at about head (sitting) height, between the two front seats. >Since the onset of hearing damage is 85 dB (i.e. 8 hours a day at 85 dB David Beierl - Providence, RI http://pws.prserv.net/synergy/Vanagon/ '84 Westy "Dutiful Passage" '85 GL "Poor Relation"
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »