

| Subject: | Re: 5hp differince 2.1l eng. |
| Date: | Tue, 23 Jan 2001 09:50:22 EST |
In a message dated 1/23/01 12:37:59 AM Eastern Standard Time, Bluemax91G@NETSCAPE.NET writes: > When the 2.1l eng was introduced it was rated at 95hp in 1986. 1987 models > also rated at 95hp in sales catalogs but the owners book rated the eng at > 90hp. all sales literature after that listed the eng at 90hp. The bentley > book rates the 2.1l at 90hp.I guess vw needed a 13hp incress for the extra > wt of the syncro models. Then in 1988 when they droped the syncro models > they 8hp increase was all they needed. > Um, first there are no differences between the engines in the years 86-91 here in the US. The hp numbers used by auto manufacturers in thier literature is always kinda subjective. In other words they try to make thier products look as good as possible using the highest numbers. They get a decent hp number that most of the time is meaningless because it is not brake hp (power at wheels) and every other car out there uses a different standard to get it's hp rating. Why did they change the literature? Maybe the first batch was an error or typo and they fixed it later. Maybe they couldn't sleep at night thinking about all those disappointed Vanagon owners who were going to have thier vans dyno tested and find that they actually only had 90 hp instead of 95, I really don't know :) Second point, VW made Syncro Vanagons from 86-91. So there would be no reason to change the hp output of these motors since they were still putting them in syncros anyway. Just FYI, Thanks, Ken Wilford Van-Again John 3:16 http://www.vanagain.com Office: (856)-765-1583 Fax: (856)-327-2242 [text/html]
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »