

| Subject: | Re: Which Vanagon to get? (f) |
| From: | Karl Wolz |
| Date: | Wed, 24 Jan 2001 14:22:02 -0700 |
Just a thought. Is it possible that we don't think of the engines as being reliable because the vans themselves are so well built? I've never owned an American vehicle that went over 120K without it falling apart to the point that, if the mechanicals had problems, the condition of the body was such that it was not worth doing the mechanical repairs. My Westy has 375K on it, and it is still worth putting $ into repairing and keeping roadworthy. Karl Wolz From: <JordanVw@AOL.COM> To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 12:27 PM Subject: Re: Which Vanagon to get? (f) > In a message dated 1/24/01 4:47:13 AM Eastern Standard Time, > wayout@IX.NETCOM.COM writes: > > > > Which Vanagon model years / engines have been really reliable? > > > > > > > > > > LOL ;<) is this friday yet?? > chris >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »