

| Subject: | Re: Any experience with electronic rust prevention? |
| From: | David Beierl |
| Date: | Thu, 25 Jan 2001 15:59:13 -0500 |
At 03:06 PM 1/25/2001, Chuck Mathis wrote: >These sound like an automotive version of the cathodic protection systems >used on petroleum pielines and the US Coast Guard's 110' patrol boats. There's a big difference here -- pipelines and ships both operate submerged in an electrolytic medium, either seawater or dirt. Cathodic protection, whether with sacrificial anodes or impressed-current systems, makes little sense without this. Aside from that, for an idea of the complexity of this field check out <http://www.nacecorrosionnetwork.com/HyperNews/get/forums/cathodes.html> or do a google search on "cathodic protection." The Nacecorrosionnetwork stuff is mostly industrial, but there is also a short thread talking about the automotive systems, including 2-3 people saying they were happy or knew of one or more individuals who were happy -- and one fellow who had this to say: >I reviewed a report on a similar system a few years ago. The company was >looking for "experts" to provide endorsements. However, the information >provided was very limited, and I had more questions than endorsements. For >example, they didn't want an assessment on the viability of the system, >they already "knew it worked". They had test reports from labs saying it >passes certain tests; but the tests were very carefully crafted by the >manufacturer. Needless to say, they didn't send the additional information >I requested, and they didn't get my endorsement. david David Beierl - Providence, RI http://pws.prserv.net/synergy/Vanagon/ '84 Westy "Dutiful Passage" '85 GL "Poor Relation"
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »