

| Subject: | Re: Cancer and 1.9 compression readings |
| From: | Joe Romas |
| Date: | Fri, 9 Feb 2001 16:56:51 -0500 |
Per Bently. 1.9 & 2.1L, 145-189 PSI, 116 PSI min. Joe ----- Original Message ----- From: "Radish150" <radish150@EARTHLINK.NET> To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 12:44 PM Subject: Cancer and 1.9 compression readings > --------------------------- > > Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 05:43:58 EST > From: Don Record <DrocerNod@AOL.COM> > Subject: Pure Vanagon Content..Was Net Cops > > Dear Listees. > My family and I want to drive our 87 Westi to the West Coast to see the one > remaining Red Wood tree be fore cancer rates become too high to make the > trip. Could anyone recommend places to find food on the way? (Because as we > know most of the food chain is becoming inedible) > > Don Record > York, PA > Glad to live on the east coast if things are that bad in Kalifornia :-) > > Haha wewy funy, but your too late, it's already gone, none left now, sorry, try > building that nice new deck out of old car hoods- Cancer rates are about one in three > in our lifetime now, will probably go up to one in two within 40 years- My food chain > is not inedible, but yours is- Oh, believe me, the east cost is worse. > > Cancer is the most lucrative business on the planet right now. First they make all > these neato lifestyle chemicals that we pay lotsa money for while we're "healthy". > Then when we get sick from those chemicals, they make very expensive slightly > different chemicals with different names which they then call "medicine", but which > really only make you sicker faster. We then stuff these in our faces because we are > too chicken to actually think for ourselves and question anything we are ever told. > Finally, the desired result is that you die poor, and someone gets richer because of > it. Pretty good racket huh? They get you coming and going. Did you know that the same > companies that make all sorts of agricultrual/industrial chemicals also make > pharmaceuticals? Nifty. > > Ok, now for the vanagon content. Can anyone please tell me what the compression > reading should be in a newer healthy 1.9, 85 vintage? Yes, I'm aware of the > importance of similarity between cyls. > > Thank you, > Mark... >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »