In a message dated 2/11/01 8:25:50 PM Eastern Standard Time, NotaJeep writes:

> I just have a little trouble relating the failure of the 2.1 connecting rods
> to the fact that that crank is not "fully' counterweighted...The 1.9's
> aren't either, correct? so if the longer stroke (with it's non-linear
> increase in acceration and big end rod loading) is NOT the reason, then WHY
> does the 1.9 not blow up like the 2.1?
>
>

There is an increased angle to the crank with the longer stroke and more
stress on the 2.1L rods.

I was referring to what T1 engines routinely are turned into...

The WBX is already, with just with a smaller cam and reduced intake with the
use of a center airbox and air runners.  Simply changing the cam AND the
intake to dual-dual throat 45 mm carbs or Digital FI, the power can jump to
150 HP or more...

I have seen MANY built T1 powered Bugs BLOW the doors off high horsepower
"American" race cars.  It is a routine as many of the VW Bug shows across the
world...And on the roads every where...

Robert

[text/html]