

| Subject: | Re: non-Vanagon suggestion |
| From: | mike miller |
| Date: | Mon, 19 Feb 2001 19:49:28 -0800 |
Is it possible to edit the archives? ----- Original Message ----- From: Bill Davidson <wdavidson@THEGRID.NET> To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 7:16 PM Subject: non-Vanagon suggestion > Some people feel strongly that there should be no non-Vanagon content on the > Vanagon list. > > Some people feel strongly that there should be non-Vanagon content. > (even though the format has been Vanagon content only for the past several > years). > > Suggestion: > > Two lists. One Vanagon content only. The other *anything but* Vanagon > content. > > The people that want Vanagon only content would stay subscribed to the > Vanagon list.... no changes necessary. > > The people that want to have non-Vanagon content can subscribe to the new > list and stay subscribed to the Vanagon list... they would get it all. > > Advantages: > > This would save lots of room in the Vanagon archives. > > This would save people time when searching (and reading) the archives. > > The people that don't want the 20 to 40 non-Vanagon posts that arrive on > many days would not get it. (and we might have fewer people leaving the list > due to being overwhelmed with email) > > The people that want both Vanagon and non-Vanagon posts would get it. > > The people that want both, but sometimes get busy and can't handle it all > can sign off of the non-Vanagon list until they have more time. > > Everyone gets what they want.... when they want it. > > That's my idea. > > Bill Davidson >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »