

| Subject: | Re: Are synchros more trouble than they are worth??? |
| From: | Stuart MacMillan |
| Date: | Mon, 5 Mar 2001 09:50:33 -0800 |
There is nothing inherently wrong with the Syncro, it is a fine vehicle, but it will cost you more to own: Complexity + expensive parts + rarity = maintenance $$$$$$. Two examples are the viscous coupling ($850) and a tranny rebuild from AA Transaxle--$1750 vs. $950 for the 2WD. You also have eight CV joints as opposed to four, and gas mileage will be less due to the extra mass being turned and moved by the engine, which is already under powered. Many parts are specific to the Syncro, and due to its rareness they are expensive and hard to get sometimes. You just have to decide if you drive through enough mud and snow to make it all worth it to you, there is no other advantage to having one beyond the "coolness factor". -- Stuart MacMillan Seattle '84 Vanagon Westfalia w/2.1 '65 MGB (Daily driver since 1969) '74 MGB GT (Restoring sloooowly) Assisting on Restoration (and spending OPM): '72 MGB GT (Daughter's) '64 MGB (Son's) Stripped and gone but their parts live on: '68 MGB, '73 MGB, '67 MGB GT
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »