

| Subject: | Re: Reinforced Tires - was Yokohama Tires Revisited |
| From: | chad knutson |
| Date: | Thu, 22 Mar 2001 12:51:58 -0600 |
Mike: Spec-wise, the Contis are solid. Here's the link: http://www.tirerack.com/tires/Spec.jsp?make=Continental&model=Contact+CR21 Might have mentioned this, but my previous tires were 205s, brand unknown. Might have been Uniroyal. Although they were nice tires in perfect weather, they were terrible winter tires for me. Too wide. I went through a stretch of being stuck every time I parked it anywhere near snow or ice, of which there is plenty in Minnesota. The Continentals were an enormous improvement. Adding a little weight in the back end didn't hurt either. Keep the rubber side down. Chad Knutson Minneapolis 87 Wolfy Mike Finkbiner wrote: > Chad - > > There has been a lot of talk about reinforced tires over the years. Could > you take a look at those and see what the maximum pressure and carrying > capacity is? Do they also have a load rating number? It would be a two or > three digit number like 95 or 103. > > I've always been curious about how they compare to the light truck tires I > have been using. The door sticker on my Westy says to use 185/14 PR, (which > I assume means reinforced) or 205/14 97 (load rating 97 ~ 1600# carrying > capacity). > > Out here I have had best results finding 195/14 Light Truck tires with load > ratings from 93 to 103. > > Thanks > > Mike Finkbiner > '87 Westy > Moscow, Idaho > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 23:39:44 -0600 > From: Chad Knutson <cskanute@BITSTREAM.NET> > Subject: Re: Yokohama Tires Revisited > > I recently put a set of Continental Contact reinforced 185/14Rs on my 87 > Wolfy. > <snip> > _________________________________________________________________ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »