

| Subject: | Re: Simpler Alternative to welding body panels |
| From: | Terry Kay |
| Date: | Thu, 29 Mar 2001 12:22:35 -0600 |
Wade, I read your posting. There was no way I was attempting to implicate the re-engineering of the automobile. What I was simply stating, was, there is new technology that CAN replace the old, phreistoric techniques, and these proceedures could be implimented here in Vanagonland, wih no consequence. They idea you were coveying was you welded all your repairs, in leu of using the panel adhesive, thats what I got out of it anyway. And I chuckled, because there is no way this could ever happen in this new world of automobile technology of paper thin sheet metal. Yor not dealing with 49 Ford's any longer. You would be straightening more twisted new metal, than the original repair. And you did state in your posting you welded All your repairs. You just didn't say how much you welded. No, I do condone the junk-yard, cave and pave, patch panel techniques that some body shops use, and I never have or will use them. I am in a different ball game than you are. My shop is in the class 8 truck repair buisness, and I specialize in the repair of Mack Trucks. And I have found several applications, where the 3-m body panel adhesives, are a better solution to the ultimate repair. I don't have the problems that you guy's in the automotive, end of it have. No air bags, no convoluting panels,--but, everthing is built heavy, and experiances one hell of beating in its lifetime, much more than a Geo Prism, or a Keo. I have never had one failure attributed to the use of 3-M's product--period. And I believe that this new technology can be applied to a Vanagon with no ill effects. This is in my professional honest opinion. Later, ______________ |[ ] [ ] [ ]\ | | | | ||-(())----(())-| Terry 85 GL
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »