

| Subject: | Re: AFM values |
| From: | Jay L Snyder |
| Date: | Tue, 3 Apr 2001 11:36:10 -0400 |
I will take several readings across the span and see what I get and post
them to the list.
Jay
James Creech <jacreech@VISUALLINK.COM> on 04/03/2001 10:51:51 AM
Please respond to James Creech <jacreech@VISUALLINK.COM>
To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM
cc: (bcc: Jay L Snyder/AE/DuPont)
Subject: Re: AFM values
Yep, you're right. Hadn't thought of the spring tension. However, the
relative values across the wiper spectrum would still yield some useful
info, I think. Additionally, if the AFM is new, presumably there would be
a
preset factory tension on the spring that would not vary terribly much from
one unit to the next - so those of us with AFM's not yet tampered with
(spring tension unchanged) could still make a helpful comparison before we
try our own adjustments.
----- Original Message -----
From: David Beierl <dbeierl@ATTGLOBAL.NET>
To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM>
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 10:41 AM
Subject: Re: AFM values
> A small caveat -- the presence of both wiper-position and spring-tension
> adjustments suggests that the absolute resistance values might be
somewhat
> variable.
>
> david
>
>
>
> At 10:33 AM 4/3/2001, James Creech wrote:
> >lost his email address. My interest, which I think many of us would
> >share, is to know from someone who has a new AFM and done the
> >measurements, what are the actual resistance values at the various
places
> >in the wiper rotation?
>
> David Beierl - Providence, RI
> http://pws.prserv.net/synergy/Vanagon/
> '84 Westy "Dutiful Passage"
> '85 GL "Poor Relation"Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »