

| Subject: | Re: Subaru Conversions Longevity? |
| From: | Andrew Grebneff |
| Date: | Mon, 2 Apr 2001 00:53:10 +1200 |
>Yeh ...What about longevity? Anybody got 100k on theirs yet? > >Haven't done, drove, or even seen one. I HAVE worked on several Outbacks >and they sure sound great!! Looks like a natural match (in my mind). Every mechanic I have talked to, as well as rally drivers, say the EJ/EG engines are bulletproof. Engine importers, who bring in containers of used engines from Japan (including every type of engine made there!), tell me they have never had to replace a sold unit yet. But ask them about Nissan RD28s and you'll get a different answer! Being a boxer, and fully-counterbalanced as a bonus, these engines should be ultrasmooth, despite their lumpy sound (just like a VW boxer). Not that I have experienced this for myself yet... The weak link in a conversion will be the trans. This is why MSDS and German repowerers are using Porsche G50 transmissions, as will I. The van itself is well and truly capable of handling the more powerful Subaru engines, its chassis dynamics and impact resistance (if ever needed!) are that good. Andrew Grebneff 165 Evans St, Dunedin, New Zealand fax 64 (3) 479-7527 <andrew.grebneff@stonebow.otago.ac.nz> VW van (something for every man), Toyota diesel & seashell nut Macintosh 7500/200/64, 6116/60/24, LCIII, LC, Classic, Plus *Even though Mac Users may be only 10% of the market, always remember that we are the TOP 10% *Computers manufactured by companies such as IBM, Compaq, Tandy and millions of others are by far the most popular with about 70 million machines in use worldwide. Macintosh fans, on the other hand, may note that cockroaches are far more numerous than humans and that numbers alone do not denote a higher life form - New York Times, November 26, 1991 *A 766mHz Mac G4 is 45% faster than a 1500mHz Pentium 4
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »