At 08:13 AM 4/18/2001 -0700, Thomas D. Hanlon wrote:
>"Thomas D. Hanlon" wrote:
>
> > Richard,
> >
> > I sympathize with your and with your position.
> >
> > Print your posting, and ask your employeer,/institution that it be made
> > part of your personnel/student record. Then, you are on notice that you
> > are not an at-work pornography reviewer.  One cannot, legally, beheld
> > responsible for intrusions into one's mailbox, regardless, and dogs WILL
> > pee on your lawn, regardless...

Thomas,

What your asking me is to go to my employer and say "Hey I'm getting porno,
albeit unsolicited, on my email"...there's nothing like catching the
attention of the campus computer services folks by pointing out a problem
with porno! Which then brings in the issue of now that I've singled myself
out, they have a wonderful excuse to monitor my email to make sure that
there are no further offending emails.

No thanks....lets go back to the question I posed earlier today....

"How many posts per day/week/year do we get from listmembers who are
stranded on the road and email the list for help versus the number of
Spam/Smut posts we get per day/week/year on this list?"  I can only
remember no more than three or four strandees in the past year....I got
three or more spam posts from this list every two days or so.

One would think that the skills necessary to keep a 9 to 20 year old van on
the road would not prevent a list member from figuring out how to use
HOTMAIL while on the road to "call for help"......

Ric

> >
> > Protect yourself in the clinches.
> >
> > BTW, Was there ever any further communications with VW-Wolfsburg about
> > the birth certificates?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Tom Hanlon
> > Palm Springs, CA
> > 84 Westfalia
> >