At 10:13 AM 4/18/01, Thomas D. Hanlon wrote:
>"Thomas D. Hanlon" wrote:
>
> > Richard,
> >
> > I sympathize with your and with your position.
> >
> > Print your posting, and ask your employeer,/institution that it be made
> > part of your personnel/student record. Then, you are on notice that you
> > are not an at-work pornography reviewer.  One cannot, legally, beheld
> > responsible for intrusions into one's mailbox, regardless, and dogs WILL
> > pee on your lawn, regardless...
> >
> > Protect yourself in the clinches.
> >

Tom and others,
         My employer has a very strict policy about smut.  Simply put, I am
subject to termination if I receive ANY smut-like material on their system,
weather I request it or not.  As a matter of fact, to keep my job I must
now post this to the list:

Let it be known that any offensive, pornographic, racist, abusive,
degrading, illegal e-mail or any email revealing any proprietary or
confidential material or information may not be sent to my email address.

Now I might breathe easier, but I will have to drop from the list until it
is closed.

See you all when the list is safe to read at work.

Chris Smith