

| Subject: | Re: Vanagon Lawsuit |
| From: | Jennifer |
| Date: | Sat, 28 Apr 2001 22:13:13 -0500 |
At 1:07 PM -0600 4/28/01, Blake Thornton rearranged electrons to say: >This is quite sad and interesting. It made me wonder when the US started >requiring shoulder belts in the rear seats (it was certainly after 1986, Doesn't the rule 'ex post facto' mean you cannot be tried for an action that was not a crime when you did it? That is, since shoulder belts were not required in the rear seat of minivans in 1986, it was not wrong for the Vanagon to not have them at that time. Or am I forgetting my high-school civics terminology? Sometimes I'm ashamed to be an American... -- ----- Jennifer - ncc876@yahoo.com ... knee-deep in the hoopla ... _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »