

| Subject: | Re: Apostrophes & spelling - RPMs? not |
| From: | Chris Stann |
| Date: | Sat, 26 May 2001 11:30:20 -0500 |
With respect to your engine RPM, RPM is always correct. Unless you wish to hook up a Tachometer to you wall clock, then we COULD have a problem. About as handy as locating gas leaks with a lit cigarette lighter. Chris. ----- Original Message ----- From: Karl Wolz <wolzphoto@worldnet.att.net> To: Chris Stann <ChrisS@INFORMS.COM>; <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2001 12:25 AM Subject: Re: Re: Apostrophes & spelling - RPMs? not > Huh? > > What about the second hand on my clock???? > > It seems to travel at 1 rpm, and that would be singular. > > In order to be technically correct, that should be: > > 1 RPM = correct > 750 RPM = acceptable, though incorrect > 750 RsPM = unacceptable, though correct > > Karl Wolz > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Chris Stann" <ChrisS@INFORMS.COM> > To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> > Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 6:03 PM > Subject: Re: Apostrophes & spelling - RPMs? not > > > > And while we're on the subject. > > > > RPM already plural, so there is no such thing as RPMs. Let me explain: > > > > RPM - Revolutions per minute. See, "revolutions" is already a plural > noun, > > so there is no need to say "750 RPMs," but you may say "750 RPM." > Because > > you would never say "750 revolutions per minutes," but you do say "750 > > revolutions per minute." > > > > In short: > > > > 750 RPM - correct > > 750 RPMs - incorrect > > 750 RPM's - also incorrect > > 750 RPM - correct > > > > Thank you, that's all for now. Next week we discuss RPM's close cousin, > > PMS. Class dismissed. > > > > Chris. > > >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »