> There is a graph at http://www.volkscafe.com/NewDynoResults.html and
> another which sound like the one your referring to at
> http://www.volkscafe.com/C-R_DynoManufacturer.html. I saw the original
> graph  on web site http://www.clubvw.org.au/wasserboxeradventure.htm.
>
> The ratio rockers in on these dyno reports are 1.4. The Pawter rockers
> are 1.3, and I believe the original rockers that Robert Lilly had used
> were 1.25, and then switched to 1.3. which I guess you have.

Yes... the second link above has the same (or similar) graph as the one I
have... and it's almost as illegible... but they have added colored
highlights so you can see the differences better... those of you interested
might want to check it out.  The article on the mod at the thidr link is
very informative... perfect reading for those thinking about the upgrade.

Actually, I went with the Pauters... 1.4 and couldn't be happier.  Of course
I don't know the difference, never having had any others except the stock
ones.  I'll gladly provide more info to anyone interested in what I did
(along with much help from Robert Lilley... hie's da man!).

Mick Kalber
89 Syncro Westy "Daddeo"
Tropical Visions Video, Inc.
62 Halaulani Place
Hilo, Hawaii 96720
808-935-5557
808-935-0066 (fax)
hotlava@interpac.net
www.volcanoscapes.com