

| Subject: | Re: Update on Waterboxer vs Transplant Power Options |
| From: | Damian Shaw |
| Date: | Mon, 4 Jun 2001 11:12:44 -0600 |
Mark; This is interesting data on your engine comparisions. I would be careful about assuming what the TIICO engine really is and thus what its power is. I think you're assuming it's a Golf/Jetta IV engine (aka the ABA block). I don't think this is true; I think it's an over-bored 1.8l block - hence the 1.8l stamping in the casting. The ABA is taller than the old 1.8 and height is everything with this conversion. VW rates the ABA at 115HP with the crossflow head and Motronic FI but VW tuners get a good 140HP or so out of it when they use the old GTI 8v head, a g-grind cam, higher compression (etc, etc) in A1 (Rabbit, Jetta, etc) upgrades. I would guess the TIICO is a unique block that is tweaked to get the power where a Vanagon needs it. Which gets me into my other observation about your data: be careful about doing a HP to HP comparison. Weight and torque curve are very important especially in a Vanagon. Finally the price on a TIICO is $3700 - not $7000. I own an ABA, a 1.8l, and soon a TIICO, so I'll definitely have more to say about these block differences when I've gotten my hands dirty. I think the Subaru can definitely offer more HP than the TIICO, and the waterboxer does get underrated around here, but VW's I-4 engines are indistructible and getting one of those in a Vanagon "the way VW would have done it" is also undervalued. Bosch's Motronic is not being given the credit it deserves either: it's a fabulous FI system. My opinion on the Tiico is that the combination of benefits makes it a superior choice. Damian
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »