* What kind of   environment impact are these cars having?*

1000 Oil puffing, rich running VW vans driving 10K a year =1 Diesel Rig
running 100K a year

On Fri, 22 Jun 2001 09:55:50 EDT KENWILFY@AOL.COM writes:
> Here in New Jersey we went to dyno testing last year.  Here are my
> observations so far:
>
> 1. Increases time of inspection by about 400%
> 2. Decreases the accuracy of emissions testing (we have had cars
> that never
> passed the old idle emissions test, pass the dyno test!)
> 3. Increases the chances of damaging the vehicle, hurting someone,
> or causing
> an accident.  Before a trip for testing was simple, now it is tense,
> hoping
> that nothing bad is going to happen.
> 4. We are having emissions tests done on every car that comes
> through except
> diesels.  I was very shocked and stupefied when I took a customer's
> 76 bus
> through inspection and they put it on a dyno.  Here is a car that
> was never
> really designed to meet any emission standard.  At the time I don't
> believe
> they had a standard, so where are the Pass/Fail numbers coming from?
> Anything before 1980 should be exempt at this point.  In NJ the rust
> catches
> up with the older cars so that we don't have a ton of them like
> California.
> The amount of pre 1980 cars that are used as daily drivers in NJ
> could
> probably fit in my local Wal-mart parking lot.  What kind of
> environment
> impact are these cars having?
>
> Is there any organized effort to petition for some kind of different
> emissions testing system?  The one we have now just isn't efficent
> and safe
> (plus it is way more expensive than the old one).
> Sorry for venting, but thanks for listening.
>
>
>
> Ken Wilford
> John 3:16
> www.vanagain.com
> Phone: (856)-765-1583
> Fax: (856)-327-2242

________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today!  For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.