

| Subject: | Re: Tough driving(thin air) |
| From: | Karl Wolz |
| Date: | Sun, 1 Jul 2001 11:15:11 -0700 |
I regularly drive from Phoenix (1500') up to the Flagstaff area (8000') and notice no difference in performance form one location to the other. I have driven the high route through Rocky Mtn. Nat'l Park @ around 13000' and though my body wasn't working too very well (pant, pant), the van still ran just fine. This all with a 1.9 in an '85 Westy. I'd start by looking at the O2 sensor. Karl Wolz ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Klun" <jklun@GJ.NET> To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> Sent: Sunday, July 01, 2001 9:57 AM Subject: Re: Tough driving(thin air) > Hey all! > > I live at 5000' and drive a stock 1.9L WBX (rebuilt 10,000 miles ago.) There is > nothing special about it. I get between 22.5 and 25.5 mpg local and highway. I > have pegged my speedo on a flat interstate (5,000' plus alt.). I take regular > trips to see our grandson who lives at 7700'. In between there are two passes > of about 8000' each. In between these passes are valleys with steep climbs and > descents. Depending on which direction I'm driving, I climb in 3rd and keep the > speed around 55-60. In the other direction I can almost do one of the climbs in > 4th around 50. The rest of the way, the road is fairly flat with the speed > limit of 65. I drive it between 65-70. From house to house it's 95 miles one > way. It takes me between 1.5 and 1.75 hours to drive that distance, depending > on traffic. > > When driving at 7700', I don't notice any difference in power or gas mileage. > Since it is electronically fuel injected, the engine compensates for it. You > must be driving air cooleds or you have a problem with your fuel and electronic > systems. By the way, I have never driven this WBX at sea level... > > Bob Nugent wrote: > > > Speaking of Santa Fe, that's where I live. I've always referred to the > > altitude here as a "reverse turbo". I suspect that if I could get the engine > > power clear up to zero, (sea-level performance, that is) I'd be able to live > > with the 2.1 WBX . I think 4 or 5 lbs. of boost would probably accomplish > > that. Anybody know of a small supercharger system that would work in that > > range -- and integrate with the fuel injection system? I can't see how that > > would put more strain on the engine than running it at sea level without a > > blower. Any ideas? > > > > Bob >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »